<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Oven: Mail Integration and the Anti-Drawer</title>
	<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Cameron Incoll</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-15428</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-15428</guid>
					<description>Re the anti-drawer - if it is not a drawer, it must be a shelf!  Either way, it works for me.

Loving this app - I'm with nathan on this, hard to topple quicksilver, but this is a pretty close second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re the anti-drawer - if it is not a drawer, it must be a shelf!  Either way, it works for me.</p>
<p>Loving this app - I&#8217;m with nathan on this, hard to topple quicksilver, but this is a pretty close second.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Gordon Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-13000</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 06:04:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-13000</guid>
					<description>Hi Jon, found your site via Twitter.  The anti-drawer looks interesting.  After reading about drawers years ago as one of the great new features of OS X, I was really disappointed with the way Apple actually implemented them.

It's basically Peeves #4 and 5 of

http://allthings.blogsome.com/2006/03/27/my-own-ten-peeves-about-the-mac/

Maybe the anti-drawer will be a good answer (not going to assume anything until actually tried out!).

Gordon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon, found your site via Twitter.  The anti-drawer looks interesting.  After reading about drawers years ago as one of the great new features of OS X, I was really disappointed with the way Apple actually implemented them.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s basically Peeves #4 and 5 of</p>
<p><a href='http://allthings.blogsome.com/2006/03/27/my-own-ten-peeves-about-the-mac/' rel='nofollow'>http://allthings.blogsome.com/2006/03/27/my-own-ten-peeves-about-the-mac/</a></p>
<p>Maybe the anti-drawer will be a good answer (not going to assume anything until actually tried out!).</p>
<p>Gordon
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: More on Mail Integration w/Actiontastic &#171; Setting Contexts</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-7465</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2007 02:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-7465</guid>
					<description>[...] For more information, click this link.  &amp;#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] For more information, click this link.  &nbsp; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: menesis</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-6780</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 15:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-6780</guid>
					<description>I'd rather had the drawer, just because it is a drawer in iCal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather had the drawer, just because it is a drawer in iCal
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tfoster</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-6149</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 22:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-6149</guid>
					<description>Love the new release. One thought. Some people (like me) just want to see their todos on a single calendar in iCal, rather than having a calendar for each context. Could you set up a preference to establish all todos within one Actiontastic iCal calendar? I find the 10 some odd calendars that have been added to iCal distracting, but I would like to see my deliverables for each day on my calendar without the tie in to context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the new release. One thought. Some people (like me) just want to see their todos on a single calendar in iCal, rather than having a calendar for each context. Could you set up a preference to establish all todos within one Actiontastic iCal calendar? I find the 10 some odd calendars that have been added to iCal distracting, but I would like to see my deliverables for each day on my calendar without the tie in to context.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-5737</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 05:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-5737</guid>
					<description>@JBob:

Yes, the URL should stick with the actions when they are moved around, but there was a bug in the 0.9.2 version that caused problems with this. 0.9.3 has fixed the issue, and I am sorry for any confusion that this may have caused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JBob:</p>
<p>Yes, the URL should stick with the actions when they are moved around, but there was a bug in the 0.9.2 version that caused problems with this. 0.9.3 has fixed the issue, and I am sorry for any confusion that this may have caused.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JBob</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-5521</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 15:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-5521</guid>
					<description>I have a bit of a problem getting the Mail-iCal-Actiontastic flow to work good. I assign a new todo @inbox for the email in mail.app. Everything works, and the new To-Do is added, with the URL. When syncing actiontastic it also appears in the inbox, complete with URL. However, when I process my inbox, the action looses the URL, meaning that I have to first copy the URL, process that one action, go to the action and paste the URL, go back and process the next etc. Very tedious. Isn't the URL supposed to stick with the action when I process it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a bit of a problem getting the Mail-iCal-Actiontastic flow to work good. I assign a new todo @inbox for the email in mail.app. Everything works, and the new To-Do is added, with the URL. When syncing actiontastic it also appears in the inbox, complete with URL. However, when I process my inbox, the action looses the URL, meaning that I have to first copy the URL, process that one action, go to the action and paste the URL, go back and process the next etc. Very tedious. Isn&#8217;t the URL supposed to stick with the action when I process it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: MailTags - 2.0b8(Beta) &#171; Setting Contexts</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4866</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 05:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4866</guid>
					<description>[...] MailTags also plays nice with Actiontastic - which I will illustrate with some screenshots later today. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] MailTags also plays nice with Actiontastic - which I will illustrate with some screenshots later today. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: epskionline</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4573</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4573</guid>
					<description>Ah, I see the problem. I didn't actually look to see what MailTags was. Yipes. I'm going to have to either commit to Mail and iCal or miss out on some interesting features, eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, I see the problem. I didn&#8217;t actually look to see what MailTags was. Yipes. I&#8217;m going to have to either commit to Mail and iCal or miss out on some interesting features, eh?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: epskionline</title>
		<link>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4572</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2007 08:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.kaboomerang.com/blog/2007/02/26/in-the-oven-mail-integration-and-the-anti-drawer/#comment-4572</guid>
					<description>Jon, I just discovered your app tonight, and I haven't read GTD in a while, but this whole integration with iCal you introduced with this update doesn't make any sense to me. In other words, I don't understand the feature. I suppose if I used iCal, it might help, but I've been looking for strong reasons to start using Apple's built-in apps and have yet to find them. If whatever you've done here is that compelling, I'd give it a shot, but perhaps you could explain it so it's a little easier for us n00b's to understand. (I'm a big fan of the apps that provide screencasts... well, not the apps themselves, but the fact that they walk you through features visually and talk you through what they're doing)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon, I just discovered your app tonight, and I haven&#8217;t read GTD in a while, but this whole integration with iCal you introduced with this update doesn&#8217;t make any sense to me. In other words, I don&#8217;t understand the feature. I suppose if I used iCal, it might help, but I&#8217;ve been looking for strong reasons to start using Apple&#8217;s built-in apps and have yet to find them. If whatever you&#8217;ve done here is that compelling, I&#8217;d give it a shot, but perhaps you could explain it so it&#8217;s a little easier for us n00b&#8217;s to understand. (I&#8217;m a big fan of the apps that provide screencasts&#8230; well, not the apps themselves, but the fact that they walk you through features visually and talk you through what they&#8217;re doing)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
